Site measurements and time studies
Measurements entered in the Lab describe the visitor’s scenario. A technical assessment requires passage widths, actual routes, interference conditions and measured cycle times.
Return to the scenario ↗CASE STUDIES & ROI
Configure a financial scenario to assess how robotics can support your business operations. Estimates are illustrative and depend on the inputs provided.
ROI CALCULATOR
Explore how robots can work alongside people and improve operations. Adjust costs, utilization and acquisition options to estimate the economic benefit.
Default figures are illustrative and editable; they are not quotations.
The lease includes the down payment, monthly installments and final buyout. The robot can remain in use after buyout; lease payments are not added to the purchase price.
Rental is assumed to continue throughout the selected period, with no transfer of ownership. If maintenance, batteries or software are included in the rental fee, set those operating costs to zero to avoid double counting.
Enter only hours when the robot performs productive tasks, not merely powered-on hours.
Battery default: €200 per replacement, with a selectable 3–5 year interval. Maintenance, energy and software costs remain editable.
The model distinguishes recovered operating capacity from achievable cash savings. Robots support staff with automatable tasks: the time made available can be reinvested in service, quality and higher-value work. Only the portion that reduces actual expenditure is counted as cash savings.
Hourly robot cost = [acquisto oppure leasing oppure noleggio + installazione + costi di esercizio + batterie + supervisione] / ore produttive total.
Estimated annual cash savings = robot hours × share of tasks supported × cash-conversion share × hourly task cost.
Annual economic benefit = estimated cash savings − annual operating costs − average annual battery costs − annual acquisition allocation.
Payback = first point at which cumulative cash flows become positive; for rental with no initial outlay, it is marked as not applicable.
Could a robot support operations in your restaurant or warehouse? Start with a site visit and process measurements.
Assess your application ↗TECHNICAL TRANSPARENCY
Published research provides case studies, not universal performance factors. Actual performance and constraints depend on the robot documentation and on-site measurements.
Measurements entered in the Lab describe the visitor’s scenario. A technical assessment requires passage widths, actual routes, interference conditions and measured cycle times.
Return to the scenario ↗Theoretical travel time = distance / speed, assuming constant speed. The simplified calculation estimates annual transport time from three visitor inputs. It does not estimate cost savings, recoverable staff time or ROI without a pilot test.
View the calculator ↗Shimmura and colleagues (2020) describe an automated guided vehicle in a restaurant and report a reduction in working hours in that case. We do not assume that the same outcome applies to every business.
Original publication · DOI ↗Technical values are entered by visitors and, where available, supported by documentation; they are not automatically verified. Site measurements must be checked on location. Results follow the disclosed formulas. Where information is insufficient, the website displays “—” rather than inventing an estimate. Illustrative animations do not demonstrate certified autonomous navigation or safety.
Describe your process, space and constraints. The initial discussion is exploratory; any detailed analysis or site visit is agreed separately.